Connecting to LinkedIn...

W1siziisijiwmtuvmdqvmtuvmdgvntqvmzgvnzi1l01ptlrbu0hfqkxpr19vtljftkrfukvex0lnqudfx3jlc2l6zwrfyw5kx3jlbmrlcmvklmpwzyjdlfsiccisinrodw1iiiwimtkymhgxmjuwiyjdxq

Blog

Yahoo accused for intercepting emails, law suit filed against Yahoo

28/05/2015 by Sharon Shahzad

W1siziisijiwmtuvmduvmjgvmtyvmdavndavmjiyl1lhag9vlmpwzyjdlfsiccisinrodw1iiiwinjawedqwmfx1mdazzsjdxq

A California judge has given the go-ahead for a US-wide class action suit to be brought against Yahoo, accusing it of intercepting emails sent from non-Yahoo Mail subscribers and scanning them to improve targeted advertising.

US district judge Lucy Koh, a veteran of tech cases including long-running disputes between Apple and Samsung, said that those who sent emails to or received emails from Yahoo Mail users after 2 October 2011 could sue as one group under the Stored Communications Act.

She added that California dwelling non-Yahoo emailers who sent or received mail after 2 October 2012 could also sue as one group under the California Invasion of Privacy Act.

Plaintiffs in the case are estimating that one million non-Yahoo Mail subscribers may be eligible to file as part of the class action suit, meaning Yahoo could be in for a sizeable fine, according to Reuters.

The web giant is accused of copying the entirety of non-Yahoo users’ emails, extracting keywords, links and attachments, classifying them and then analyzing them to create targeted advertising for Yahoo users.

It should be added that Yahoo’s filters at this stage also pick out malware and spam.

Yahoo requires its own users to agree to its “interception, scanning, analysis, and storage of email in exchange for Yahoo Mail services,” but is accused of failing to obtain clear consent from non-Yahoo subscribers and of keeping the matter quiet in its external comms.

Koh apparently threw out Yahoo’s argument that some plaintiffs effectively gave their consent to its scanning by continuing to email Yahoo users after they found out about the targeted ad system.

She is said to have refused a similar class action suit against Google because it was harder to tell which users had consented in that case.

This article has been extracted from http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com, please click on this link to read the article in full http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/judge-oks-lawsuit-yahoo/

Montash is a multi-award winning global technology recruitment business. Specialising in permanent and contract positions across mid-senior appointments across a wide range of industry sectors and IT functions, including:

ERP Recruitment, BI & Data Recruitment, Information Security Recruitment, Enterprise Architecture & Strategy Recruitment , Energy Technology Recruitment, Demand IT and Business Engagement Recruitment, Digital and E-commerce Recruitment, Leadership Talent, Infrastructure and Service Delivery Recruitment, Project and Programme Delivery Recruitment.

Montash is headquartered in Old Street, London, in the heart of the technology hub. Montash has completed assignments in over 30 countries and has appointed technical professionals from board level to senior and mid management in permanent and contract roles.

comments powered by Disqus

Social Stream

Latest News

W1siziisijiwmtcvmdkvmjkvmdgvmtmvmjkvmjgyl1vudgl0bgvkigrlc2lnbiaomjuplmpwzyjdlfsiccisinrodw1iiiwimzgwedewmcmixv0

Are PSLs a Blocker or an Enabler?

2017-10-02 11:00:00 +0100

The use of a Preferred Supplier List (PSL) was intended to support and strengthen relationships and performance between organisations and their third party suppliers. As the technical landscape continues to evolve at rapid rate recruitment and demand for new skills becomes more intense. Are PSLs still the solution or an obstacle to sourcing the right talent? The traditional PSL A dedicated list of partners intended to guarantee quality and availability ...

W1siziisijiwmtcvmdkvmjevmdgvndmvmduvmtmxl1vudgl0bgvkigrlc2lnbiaomjmplmpwzyjdlfsiccisinrodw1iiiwimzgwedewmcmixv0

Why do we punish the victims of hacking?

2017-09-21 09:00:00 +0100

Hacks occur every 39 seconds, with 95% of them targeting governments, retailers and the tech industry. If the hackers are caught, they'll face prison time under the Computer Misuse Act. More often than not, the businesses who are victims of those attacks expose themselves to punishment of their own. The laws that determine the duty of protection owed to businesses and their customers is both vague and broad, making them question just how much protection...